F29 Release: Linux Validation

F29 Linux Product Validation Log

Masks for F29...Passed
DAE Regression Test...Passed
Linux DRGFilt for F29...Passed
Demo Linux version of DRGFilt...Passed
Linux C Shared Object for F29...Passed
Linux Perl Shared Object for F29...Passed
Linux PHP Shared Object for F29...Passed
Linux CGI-DRG for F29...Passed

Details

Masks for F29...Passed
Validated the masks file against official list, which we found here. Not that some MS-DRGs are not defined, such as 9, 18, 19, etc.

DAE Regression Test...Passed
Ran the latest DAE through our regression testing suite.

[Tue Oct 11 16:33:41 2011]     | --------SUMMARY-----------
[Tue Oct 11 16:33:41 2011]     |   v29: Ok
[Tue Oct 11 16:33:41 2011]     |   v28: Ok
[Tue Oct 11 16:33:41 2011]     |   v27(poa): Ok
[Tue Oct 11 16:33:41 2011]     |   v27: Ok
[Tue Oct 11 16:33:41 2011]     |   v26(poa): Ok
[Tue Oct 11 16:33:41 2011]     |   v26: Ok
[Tue Oct 11 16:33:41 2011]     |   v25: Ok
[Tue Oct 11 16:33:41 2011]     |   v24: Ok
[Tue Oct 11 16:33:41 2011]     |   v23: Ok
[Tue Oct 11 16:33:41 2011]     |   v22: Ok
[Tue Oct 11 16:33:41 2011]     |   v21: Ok
[Tue Oct 11 16:33:41 2011]     |   v20: Ok
[Tue Oct 11 16:33:41 2011]     |   v19: Ok
[Tue Oct 11 16:33:41 2011]     |   v18: Ok
[Tue Oct 11 16:33:41 2011]     |   v17: Ok
[Tue Oct 11 16:33:41 2011]     |   v16: Ok
[Tue Oct 11 16:33:41 2011]     |   v15: Ok
[Tue Oct 11 16:33:41 2011]     |   v14: Ok
[Tue Oct 11 16:33:41 2011]     |   v13: Ok
[Tue Oct 11 16:33:41 2011]     |   v12: Ok




Linux DRGFilt for F29...Passed
Validated the DAE with DRGFilt against the test data set with this control file:

age  000 03
sex  003 01
ds   004 02
dxl  000 08
poa  000 07
dx   023 96
sgl  000 07
surg 223 98
exmp 006 01
# these are written out by us
drg  607 03
mdc  610 02
rc   612 02
dflg 614 15
sflg 629 15

Using our validation script, we compare the incoming DRG at offset 603 to our DRG at offset 607, the incoming MDC at 600 with ours at 610, the incoming RC at offset 598 with ours at 612.

Demo Linux version of DRGFilt...Passed
This free version only does F10. Validated it against our internal F10 dataset of 35,451 records.

Interactive Test Cases
We don't run the entire test dataset through our interactive UIs because it would be too much work for too little gain. Once we validate the core DAE, we validate the UIs with a sample of the official test dataset. This year that sample looks like this:

-------------------------------------------
   Age: 049
   Sex: F
  Disp: 01
   MDC: 21
   DRG: 908
  DX's:  Code :E:P where E=exempt flag P=present on admission flag
  DX01: 99679 : :
  DX02: 25041 : :
  DX03: 5859  : :
  DX04: 2767  : :
  DX05: 25051 : :
  DX06: 36904 : :
  DX07: 25061 : :
  DX08: 3371  : :
  DX09: 40290 : :
  DX10: 2859::

Proc's:  Code
  SG01: 3942  
  SG02: 3993  
  SG03: 3995
-------------------------------------------
   Age: 059
   Sex: M
  Disp: 01
   MDC: 01
   DRG: 074
  DX's:  Code :E:P where E=exempt flag P=present on admission flag
  DX01: 3564  : :
  DX02: 2639  : :
  DX03: 311   : :
  DX04: 2761  : :
  DX05: 5601  : :
  DX06: 5180::

Proc's:  Code
  SG01: 9383  
  SG02: 9339

-------------------------------------------
   Age: 050
   Sex: M
  Disp: 01
   MDC: 04
   DRG: 182
  DX's:  Code :E:P where E=exempt flag P=present on admission flag
  DX01: 1628::

Proc's:  Code
  SG01: 324   
  SG02: 3409  
  SG03: 8965  
  SG04: 9396

-------------------------------------------
   Age: 077
   Sex: F
  Disp: 03
   MDC: 08
   DRG: 563
  DX's:  Code :E:P where E=exempt flag P=present on admission flag
  DX01: 81611 : :
  DX02: 25081 : :
  DX03: 2512  : :
  DX04: E8849 : :
  DX05: 3319  : :
  DX06: 04110 : :
  DX07: 8831::

Proc's:  Code
  SG01: 7904  
  SG02: 9659  
  SG03: 8659

-------------------------------------------
   Age: 081
   Sex: F
  Disp: 01
   MDC: 02
   DRG: 117
  DX's:  Code :E:P where E=exempt flag P=present on admission flag
  DX01: 3659::

Proc's:  Code
  SG01: 1279

Linux C Shared Object for F29...Passed
Validated the Linux C shared object with this test case, to also confirm that the used codes bit flag handling is now correct:

-------------------------------------------
   Age: 055
   Sex: F
  Disp: 01
   MDC: 08
   DRG: 455
  DX's:  Code :E:P where E=exempt flag P=present on admission flag
  DX01: 71500 : :Y

Proc's:  Code
  SG01: 8134  
  SG02: 8135


Raw return value from mhdrg:
0^8^455^29^5.6449^0.00^ ^COMBINED ANTERIOR/POSTERIOR SPINAL FUSION W/O CC/MCC                  ^1^11

Deconstructed return value from mhdrg:
rc=0, mdc=8, drg=455, ovn=29, weight=5.6449, mean=0.00, porm=
desc=COMBINED ANTERIOR/POSTERIOR SPINAL FUSION W/O CC/MCC                 
dx flags:1, px flags: 11

Expected result: RC: 0 MDC: 08 DRG: 455

Significant ICD codes:
 * DX code  1 was used
 * Proc code  1 was used
 * Proc code  2 was used

Linux Perl Shared Object for F29...Passed
Validated the Perl shared object against the same test case as C shared object.

THIS YEAR, WE WILL HAVE TO CHANGE OUR PROCESS TO HANDLE THE 5.8 VS POST-5.8 DIVIDE, AS WELL AS MULT-THREADED VS NOT-MULTI-THREADED.


Linux PHP Shared Object for F29...Passed
Validated the Perl shared object against the same test case as C shared object.

Linux CGI-DRG for F29...Passed
Validated the Linux CGI-DRG against same test case as C shared object.